Generally for dryland I would say that below twenty is "really" bad, twenty to twenty-five is "pretty" bad, twenty five to thirty is "not so" good, thirty to forty is "pretty" good, forty to sixty is "really" good, and above sixty is "incredibly" good.
The scale for irrigated would be about fifteen to thirty above the dryland, depending on how much we watered it. (this year is definitely closer to thirty, as we watered the snot out of it.)
I would rate this years wheat crop as ranging from "really" bad to "not so" good.
Looking back at the pictures of this particular field in March (Part 4) and April (Part V,) however, I would call twenty-four nothing short of "Incredibly" good.
2 Comments:
Where does that range on the good to bad scale?
4:31 PM, July 14, 2008
Generally for dryland I would say that below twenty is "really" bad, twenty to twenty-five is "pretty" bad, twenty five to thirty is "not so" good, thirty to forty is "pretty" good, forty to sixty is "really" good, and above sixty is "incredibly" good.
The scale for irrigated would be about fifteen to thirty above the dryland, depending on how much we watered it. (this year is definitely closer to thirty, as we watered the snot out of it.)
I would rate this years wheat crop as ranging from "really" bad to "not so" good.
Looking back at the pictures of this particular field in March (Part 4) and April (Part V,) however, I would call twenty-four nothing short of "Incredibly" good.
5:28 PM, July 14, 2008
Post a Comment
<< Home